This expression is not ours, nor does it even suit us; but it suits perfectly Him through whom the gates of Hell have not prevailed. Indeed, Archbishop Lefebvre was right on every point in this crisis which continues and whose end is known to God alone. He was right to fight the liberals before, during, and after the Council. From his time at the French Seminary in Rome, he had already recognized their activity within the Church. It was the liberals who succeeded in driving

Two years after his suspension a divinis, Archbishop Lefebvre wrote: “We are suspended a divinis by the Conciliar Church and for the Conciliar Church, of which we do not wish to be a part. This Conciliar Church is a schismatic Church because it has broken with the Catholic Church of all time.¹” Bishop Tissier de Mallerais himself is no less explicit: “Formally considered, the Conciliar Church is a sect occupying the Catholic Church.²” Father Calmel also, as early as 197

After 38 years, Écône will once again become the setting for consecrations—without the approval of neo-modernist and neo-Protestant Rome, but with the approval of eternal Rome, the guardian of truth and wisdom. Since we have no contact whatsoever with those involved in this momentous event, we can only judge it from the outside. From this perspective, everything seems to be unfolding within a framework that Archbishop Lefebvre would have fully approved of. But we must still a

As far as we can judge, the Society of Saint Pius X, in the person of its Superior General, Rev. Fr. Davide Pagliarani, is making a great effort to resume brilliantly the combat of Archbishop Lefebvre, through the latest decisions taken regarding the forthcoming consecrations and through the strong declaration of Catholic faith issued on the 14th of this month, Feast of the Ascension. May Our Lord and His Most Holy Mother bless this effort and guide the Society in the paths o

by Fr. Davide Pagliarani Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X Most Holy Father, For more than fifty years, the Society of Saint Pius X has endeavoured to set before the Holy See a matter of conscience in the face of the errors that are destroying Catholic faith and morals. Regrettably, all the discussions entered into have remained without result, and none of the concerns expressed have received any truly satisfactory response. For more than fifty yea

Dear faithful, before I say a few words about the mystery of the Church—and more specifically, one of the most serious aspects of the crisis the Church is currently facing—allow me to briefly introduce our priestly society, the Society of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary. What is SAJM? On November 21, 2017, Bishop Christian Jean Michel Faure promulgated the definitive statutes of the Society of the Apostles of Jesus and Mary, a priestly society of communal life without vows. In

Divine Providence is good toward the Society of Saint Pius X. It is granting it a good opportunity to place itself once again at the height of the combat and to do so in the spirit and the letter of Archbishop Lefebvre. Deo gratias! May it truly be so. The letter of February 18 from the General Council of the Society to the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is good. It explains, indeed, clearly, wherein lies the impossibility of reaching an agreement o

The Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Víctor Manuel Fernández, received the Superior General of the Society of Saint Pius X at the Palace of the Holy Office in Rome. What does Cardinal Fernández want? That the decision to consecrate bishops on July 1 be suspended by the Society, as a condition for continuing the dialogue. The term “dialogue” is the Cardinal’s; it is typical of the language and mentality of progressives. But how should this dialogue be qu

The communiqué from Menzingen dated February 2, the feast of the Purification of Our Lady, announces new episcopal consecrations for July 1. After contact with Rome and after having received a letter that “in no way responds to our requests,” Fr . Pagliarani, Superior General of the SSPX, supported by the unanimous opinion of his Council, judges that “the objective state of grave necessity” in which souls find themselves requires such a decision. We can only rejoice at this n

Just as God gave to Adam, in the person of Eve, a helper similar to himself, so too God gave to the new Adam (Jesus Christ), Mary, the new Eve, as a helper similar to Him. The Most Holy Virgin Mary is therefore the helper similar to Our Lord: adjutorium simile sibi (Gen. 2:18), who shares in the work of Redemption as taught by the Magisterium of the Church. The Church has gathered the arguments of the Fathers and Doctors, and has already spoken on this prerogative on more